<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Web 2.0 Blog &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.myweb20blog.com/category/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.myweb20blog.com</link>
	<description>Attempting to Understand All That Is Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:05:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Change we can believe in?</title>
		<link>http://www.myweb20blog.com/2009/01/27/change-we-can-believe-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.myweb20blog.com/2009/01/27/change-we-can-believe-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack+obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web+2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myweb20blog.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re one week into Barack Obama&#8217;s presidency and I&#8217;m realizing that his taking over for Bush has an interesting, perhaps even fundamental, parallel with the beginnings of Web 2.0. According to the Wikipedia entry on Web 2.0, Tim O&#8217;Reilly (who helped coin the phrase) was using the term in referring to: &#8220;the historical context of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re one week into Barack Obama&#8217;s presidency and I&#8217;m realizing that his taking over for Bush has an interesting, perhaps even fundamental, parallel with the beginnings of Web 2.0.</p>
<p>According to the Wikipedia entry on <a title="Wikipedia: Web 2.0" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0" target="_blank">Web 2.0</a>, Tim O&#8217;Reilly (who helped coin the phrase) was using the term in referring to:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;the historical context of web businesses &#8216;coming back&#8217; after the 2001 collapse of the dot-com bubble, in addition to the distinguishing characteristics of the projects that survived the bust or thrived thereafter.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It was a response to what people realized (too late) was a faulty business model. Sound familiar? Look at Bush&#8217;s most recent approval rating and you&#8217;ll have some idea of what I&#8217;m talking about.</p>
<p>Of course, Web 2.0 wasn&#8217;t the paradigm shift that Obama is to Bush. It was more of a readjustment. &#8220;This didn&#8217;t work, but parts of it did, so let&#8217;s dump this, tweak that, keep this stuff, move these things around, bring some new ideas in, get users more involved and, voila, the new Internet.&#8221; What I think has been similar, though, is the public&#8217;s reaction to these changes.</p>
<p>Web 2.0 has been tremendously popular with Internet users. Check Alexa&#8217;s <a title="Alexa's Global Top Sites" href="http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/top_sites?ts_mode=global&amp;lang=none" target="_blank">Global Top Sites</a> list and you&#8217;ll find YouTube, MySpace, Facebook and Blogger in the top 10, and I&#8217;m guessing sites such as Flickr, LinkedIn and Twitter are moving up quickly. And Obama&#8217;s approval rating is higher than any incoming president since Kennedy&#8217;s in 1961.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, the term &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; first become notable in &#8217;04, the year of Obama&#8217;s coming out party at the Democratic National Convention, and it seems like the majority of people are still enamored with both. Now, though, comes their first true tests.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s finally in office and he&#8217;s inherited an unholy mess. Expectations are sky-high and the pressure is on for him to fix, well, everything.</p>
<p>Web 2.0 has been around for half a decade and, while still popular, many of the sites haven&#8217;t figured out how to become profitable. Now, EVERY business is trying to figure out that very thing, so it&#8217;s not only about profitability &#8211; it&#8217;s about survival.</p>
<p>For both Obama and Web 2.0, it&#8217;s all about the bottom line. Results.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re at a fascinating time in the United States. Is President Obama all that he&#8217;s been hyped up to be or is he just another politician, albeit a historically different one? Will Web 2.0 continue to change the Internet or will it crumble like much of the Web&#8217;s first iteration?</p>
<p>Whatever the case may be, I&#8217;m up for the ride, and that&#8217;s why I started this blog. I want to not only document this crucial time for Web 2.0 and see what happens, but also learn more about the various parts that make up the whole. And I&#8217;m guessing the president will get mentioned a few more times down the road, too.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading this and I hope you continue to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.myweb20blog.com/2009/01/27/change-we-can-believe-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
